IT Tips & Tricks
The MSP Growth Trap
When Great Techs and Engineers Do the Wrong Work
Published 23 July 2026
Why do some Managed Service Providers (MSPs) scale faster, protect margins better and keep their best techs and engineers happier?
It isn’t because they put in longer hours. The difference is what their techs and engineers spend their hours doing.
Why do some MSPs scale faster, protect margins better and keep their best techs and engineers happier?
Some work builds trust, strengthens client relationships and opens the door to future business. Some work gets the project across the finish line. Some work appears only after users start working in the new environment. And some work is valuable, technical and absolutely necessary, but still not the best use of a senior tech or engineer’s time if it can be handled automatically, accurately and at scale.
The best MSPs know the difference. More importantly, they know when human expertise should lead and when automation should carry the load.
1. Strategic Work
Strategic work defines the plan: the strategy, architecture and business direction. It’s what ultimately delivers the business improvement, risk reduction and long-term success that clients desire. Examples include:
- Designing a Microsoft 365 environment that can support future growth.
- Creating governance policies that people might actually follow.
- Improving security posture.
- Building smart information architecture.
- Advising on compliance, retention and data lifecycle management.
- Helping leadership make better decisions about how information should be organized, secured and used.
This is where an MSP becomes more than a vendor. They become a strategic partner.
Strategic work affects how the client’s business operates. It reduces risk. It improves productivity. It makes future projects easier. It gives your clients confidence that the technology environment you created is not just functioning, but fully supporting the business.
This is also where your best techs, engineers, consultants and architects should be spending more of their time.
2. Delivery Work
This is the practical execution that turns a strategic plan into a working environment. It usually includes:
- SharePoint Tenant migrations.
- SharePoint implementations.
- Microsoft Teams deployments.
- Data Hygiene.
- Data migrations.
- Cloud transitions.
- Server consolidations.
- File system reorganization.
- Permissions management.
- Cybersecurity upgrades.
So, while the strategy work gave us the plan, the architecture and the direction, the delivery work implements it. Both matter. The problem is that when it comes to competitors, delivery work has become harder for MSPs to use as a true differentiator on its own. Many competitors also have solid migration tools, proven project plans and competent technical teams.
Clients expect these projects to work. They expect the files to arrive. They expect Microsoft 365 to function. They expect Microsoft Teams to be usable and SharePoint to behave like SharePoint, not like a haunted filing cabinet with a semi-functional search bar.
Doing delivery work well is essential. And it’s pretty much become the baseline. This means that you need to find the differentiator, the thing that sets you apart from your competitors and the thing that improves your margin.
The growth opportunity isn’t simply doing more projects. It’s doing them more profitably while freeing your team for high-value work (such as servicing new clients).
You need to find the differentiator, the thing that sets you apart from your competitors and the thing that improves your margin.
3. Follow-Up Work
Follow-up work is where the margin starts slipping out the back door. It’s the work that appears after the project is technically complete. It’s often kick-started when users discover that their data isn’t functioning as it did pre-migration. For example:
- Users can’t find files where they expect them.
- Document ownership is unclear.
- Permissions behave differently than they did before.
- Metadata is inconsistent across libraries.
- Shared files are no longer accessible.
- Spreadsheets, PDFs, CAD files or Word documents lose important connections.
- Search results feel unreliable.
- Teams lose confidence in the new environment.
This work matters because it impacts the client’s opinion of the project’s success.
A migration can be technically successful and still feel messy to users. The files may have moved. The environment may be live. The project may even be marked complete. But if users spend the next two months filing service tickets, hunting for documents or wondering why previously connected files no longer behave properly, the project doesn’t feel finished to them.
This is what makes follow-up work so important to clients and simultaneously so dangerous for your margins.
It often fails to make it into the original project plan. For example, there’s no line item for “three days of chasing weird link issues while everyone gets increasingly annoyed.” But it happens. And when it happens, the client often sees it as your part of finishing the job.
There’s no line item for “three days of chasing weird link issues while everyone gets increasingly annoyed.”
From their perspective, those links worked before the migration. Now they don’t. Therefore, it’s the MSP’s problem.
From the MSP’s perspective, restoring a client’s missing data may not be fully billable. It may not be easy to scope. It may not even show up until users begin working in the new environment.
That’s what makes follow-up work so expensive. It hides inside otherwise successful projects.
4. Precision Work
Precision work is technical, important and often highly specialized. And it may need to be performed at a scale, speed and level of consistency that humans aren’t built for.
It looks like this:
- Repeating the same technically precise task hundreds or thousands of times
- Finding inconsistencies across moved or reorganized content
- Comparing permissions across libraries
- Validating whether files still point to the correct locations
- Checking large numbers of documents for broken references
- Repairing links across thousands of files
In many projects, this work is critical to the success of the migration.
It’s also the kind of work where even excellent people can become the bottleneck. Senior techs and engineers might be capable of doing it, but that doesn’t mean they should be required to painstakingly manually fix errors. It’s simply not the best business model for an MSP.
Precision work is where automation earns its place because the work is too important to leave to slow, repetitive, error-prone human effort when software can handle it faster, more accurately and more consistently.
The Best MSPs Don’t Eliminate Work: They Insist on Precision Automation
Automation is often described as a way to finish projects faster. That’s largely true, but it misses the bigger point. The real value of automation is that it changes what your techs and engineers are available to do.
When large-scale precision tasks are handled automatically, your team has more time to service existing clients or to plan, consult, optimize, secure, advise and improve the environment for a new client. And new clients mean new income.
That’s a much better use of talent. It’s also a better business model.
Why waste your best people on tasks that can be virtually automated?
A Better Question About Automation
Many MSPs ask: “How can automation reduce project time?” That’s a useful question, but a better one is: “Which technical tasks need speed and accuracy at a scale that manual effort cannot deliver efficiently?”
For many MSPs, the answer includes things like:
- Detecting inconsistencies after file system reorganizations.
- Reducing preventable service tickets.
- Avoiding manual post-project cleanup.
- Comparing permissions across large environments.
- Finding broken file links.
- Repairing links after migration.
- Protecting links before content moves.
When links break during a migration, the client expects the MSP to handle the problem.
These tasks matter. In some environments, they matter enormously. But they shouldn’t require your most experienced techs and engineers to spend hours hunting through documents, spreadsheets, folders and file paths by hand or with some search-and-replace tool.
Automation doesn’t replace expertise. It gives expertise room to breathe.
Where LinkFixer Advanced Fits
This is where LinkFixer Advanced™ becomes relevant for MSPs that handle file migrations, SharePoint moves, Microsoft 365 projects, server refreshes, cloud transitions or file system reorganizations.
Broken links aren’t just a nuisance. They can be a technical problem buried inside files that users depend on every day. Word documents, Excel spreadsheets, PDFs, CAD files and other linked content can all contain references that need to survive movement from one environment to another. Solving that manually can demand enormous patience, deep file knowledge and a tolerance for repetitive work that no human should be expected to endure. But what do your clients get out of an automated solution?
It’s the kind of outcome that results in word-of-mouth advertising … for you.
Immediate data integrity. No link-related data loss, disruption or halted productivity. It’s the kind of outcome that results in word-of-mouth advertising … for you.
LinkFixer Advanced is designed to help protect links before a migration or repair broken links afterward, so MSPs aren’t left manually chasing file references across large collections of business-critical content. That’s no small achievement.
The software has been built around a deep understanding of how major file types store and manage links internally. It addresses link problems at a level that would be extremely difficult, slow, error-prone and impractical for a human team to manage across thousands or millions of files, even with a search-and-replace tool.
For MSPs, it means a technical problem that could otherwise consume expensive engineering hours can be handled most efficiently with purpose-built automation.
Final Thoughts
You want great results. Your clients want great results. And great results are what you get from the company that invented link management and has been doing it consistently for over 25 years.
For MSPs, that matters because not only can this automation give you the edge over your competitors, it can also boost your margins.
The MSPs that scale think differently.
And that’s what you want. Company growth. Financial growth. And a differentiator that makes your competitors look at you and ask, “How the hell are they doing that?”
The MSPs that scale think differently.
By Ed Clark
LinkTek COO
Ed Clark
Feel free to share this article on your social media:
Recent Comments
- No recent comments available.
ChatGPT,
Gemini,
Claude and
Copilot
Leave a Comment